In a case that has captured national concern for over three years, the Philippine Department of Justice (DOJ) is continuing its probe into the mysterious disappearance of multiple cockfight bettors—commonly known as sabungeros—with new developments pointing toward individuals previously not associated with the investigation.
According to official updates, investigators are now reviewing statements that have brought forward the names of businessman Charlie “Atong” Ang and former actress Gretchen Barretto as individuals potentially connected to the broader circumstances surrounding the missing individuals. Both Ang and Barretto have publicly denied any wrongdoing.
Background on the Disappearances
Between 2021 and 2022, families began reporting their loved ones missing after they participated in various cockfighting events, including online matches under the e-sabong format. These matches gained massive popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic due to restricted public gatherings, shifting much of the cockfighting activity to digital platforms.
The disappearances of these individuals have caused emotional distress for their families and sparked growing demands for answers. Government agencies, including the DOJ, Philippine National Police (PNP), and National Bureau of Investigation (NBI), have been involved in tracing leads and conducting parallel inquiries to determine what happened.
Although cockfighting is legal and culturally embedded in many parts of the Philippines, concerns have been raised over how digital versions of the sport may have allowed for unchecked activities and possible illegal operations.
New Testimonies Raise Questions
The DOJ recently acknowledged the emergence of a new witness statement from a former employee linked to one of the cockfighting operations. The witness, who once served in a security-related role, claims that some individuals involved in the administration of e-sabong may have been aware of or had knowledge about incidents involving missing players.
Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin Remulla, in an official media interview, confirmed that the names of Atong Ang and Gretchen Barretto were mentioned in the statement. He noted that mentioning their names does not equate to immediate guilt or charges but warrants further review under the principles of due process.
He emphasized, “They are now part of the inquiry. That means we will examine the details carefully, assess the evidence provided, and determine if there’s a basis to move forward with legal action.”
Public Reactions and Legal Responses
Ang and Barretto have denied any involvement. Ang, a businessman known for his previous engagements in the gaming and e-sabong industry, has argued that the testimony lacks merit and accused the witness of extortion. He claims that the accusations are part of a scheme to damage his name and extract money from him.
Meanwhile, Gretchen Barretto, a retired entertainment figure and investor in legal businesses, has likewise rejected any implication of wrongdoing. Through legal counsel, she has stated her willingness to cooperate with any lawful investigation and welcomes the opportunity to clear her name.
Both parties have underscored that they have not received any formal charges from the DOJ as of this writing. Their legal teams have also reminded the public and the media that accusations alone do not imply guilt and that the rights of individuals must be upheld throughout any proceedings.
Presumption of Innocence and Public Accountability
Legal experts remind observers that investigations involving public figures often draw significant media and public attention, but this attention should not override legal principles.
“The presumption of innocence is a fundamental right. Even if names are mentioned in witness statements, it doesn’t mean someone is guilty until proven so in court,” said Attorney Marcelo Reyes, a criminal law professor based in Manila. “The justice system is based on evidence, not on public opinion.”
He also pointed out that those accused have every right to seek legal remedies, including countersuits if the accusations are proven to be false or malicious.
Search for the Missing Continues
While the legal processes unfold, families of the missing sabungeros continue their search for answers. They have consistently appealed to law enforcement authorities to exhaust all investigative leads and ensure that the case is resolved transparently and promptly.
Some of the families have expressed cautious optimism that renewed attention to the case may help bring clarity to the fate of their loved ones. Others, however, remain skeptical, noting the slow progress over the past few years.
One family member of a missing sabungero, who requested anonymity, said, “We don’t care who gets investigated as long as the authorities tell us where our son is. We need closure. That’s what we’ve wanted from the beginning.”
Government and Law Enforcement Updates
The Department of Justice has reiterated its commitment to pursuing the case without bias or favoritism. In a recent press briefing, Remulla said the DOJ will assess all testimonies, documents, and digital records, especially those tied to online cockfighting operations.
The Philippine National Police, meanwhile, has reactivated its special task force on missing persons, focusing on gathering forensic evidence and re-interviewing persons of interest. According to police officials, some digital traces from phones and bank records are still being analyzed.
The Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR) has also pledged support by reviewing the history of licensed e-sabong operators and investor records.
The Rise and Suspension of E-Sabong
This case has reignited national debate over e-sabong, which became a multibillion-peso industry at its peak. Though officially suspended in 2022 by the President due to public outcry over alleged abuses, many online platforms were reported to have continued operating illegally.
Lawmakers are currently reviewing proposed legislation to regulate or permanently ban online cockfighting. Some senators have called for stricter oversight mechanisms, while others have argued that e-sabong—if regulated properly—could be a legal and profitable enterprise for the government.
Lessons and Next Steps
This ongoing investigation serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in balancing culture, business, and the rule of law. While cockfighting is part of Filipino tradition, the rapid shift to online operations exposed gaps in regulation, accountability, and player safety.
As more names come into public focus, legal institutions must ensure that all proceedings are handled with care, impartiality, and adherence to constitutional protections. At the same time, the government must provide clarity and transparency to grieving families and concerned citizens who demand justice.
Conclusion
The case of the missing sabungeros is far from resolved. The Department of Justice has taken important steps by exploring all angles, including examining new testimonies. As investigators proceed, it remains essential to protect the rights of both the accused and the victims’ families.
Moving forward, the focus must remain on uncovering the truth—without bias, speculation, or undue pressure. Accountability must be pursued wherever the evidence leads, but it must be guided by law, not by emotion or rumor.
As the nation watches closely, it is clear that the search for justice—for both the missing individuals and those falsely accused—will shape how future cases involving influential personalities are handled in the Philippines.